Environmental Review: Mitigation
Avoiding, minimizing and mitigating are at the heart of the planning process established in Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. When an adverse effect to historic properties cannot be avoided, the Section 106 participants, including the federal agencies, consulting parties, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the public identify measures to mitigate the adverse effect. The idea behind mitigation is to balance the loss (or diminishment) of the historic resources through some public benefit.
Standard mitigation measures of photographic documentation for structures and excavation for archaeological sites often provide important new information. It is important that this information is made available to the public. Other mitigation measures include community outreach and/or education to help provide more public benefit. When photographic documentation is agreed upon as a mitigation strategy for historic properties with state and local levels of significance, please use HPD’s
Guidelines
for Establishing a Photographic Permanent Archival Record (PAR)
.
The following are other examples of mitigation documentation resulting from various Section 106 projects:
- Historic Context & Inventory -
Historic Streetcar Systems in Georgia, January 2012
- Photographic Archival Record -
617 Parkway Drive NE, Atlanta, Fulton County, November 2024
- Photographic Archival Record -
USDA-ARS UGA Tifton Campus, Tift County, August 2023
- Cemetery Survey Report -
Oliver Cemetery, Byromville, Dooly County, May 2022
- Historic Resources Survey Report -
Hawkinsville, Pulaski County, February 2024
- Attrition Study Report -
Braselton, Jackson County, December 2020